OK John, full explanation time.
I think there is a good chance that if
we take in refugees we will be attacked. I think we have to do it
anyway. First, because we are human beings with human compassion and
it is the right thing to do. Each person we turn away would be at
least living in a hellish situation and just might be killed. It's
like Schindler's List. Each one is a life we could save. Think
about it this way. Each year over 10,000 people die in firearms
homicides in this country. (
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm
) Each year there are over 30,000 auto related deaths.
(http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/general-statistics/fatalityfacts/state-by-state-overview
) Each year untold hundreds of thousands die from heart disease,
diabetes and other diet related health issues. And yet we still have
guns, Big Macs, and cars. Why? Because on some level we realize
life is inherently dangerous and choose to live a life based on our
principles in spite of the danger. Compassion is one of those
principles. This is my first, and probably most important, argument.
But there is more.
As I said, I understand there is no
diplomatic negotiation that will ever work with ISIS. There is no
appeasement. None of that will work. Ever. And yet we cannot just
go in there dropping bombs and killing people.
When the time comes to fight ISIS, it
will likely require a commitment to war the like Sherman's march to
the sea or Genghis Khan. I don't know if you know this, but many in
the South are still pissed off by that whole Sherman thing, it leaves a lasting impression. This
type of warfare will require things most Americans are uncomfortable
with, hell, most of the world will be uncomfortable with and unlike
previous wars, all of it will be news. They are teaching grade
school children to fight and be suicide bombers as you know. (PBS
Frontline ISIS in Afghanistan -
http://video.pbs.org/video/2365608927/
) You cannot win a war like that without a steel resolve that is
currently not present either here or in the international community.
We would be committing unjustified atrocities. This would feed
directly in to the desire of the enemy.
Their entire worldview, from
recruitment to retention, their propaganda, their entire identity and
narrative relies on their heroic opposition to an oppressive Western
World. Unfortunately, they have a lot of material with which to
work. They can point to countless instances of Westerners,
predominantly Christian westerners negatively meddling in their
world. From propping up dictatorial regimes, to dropping bombs and
drone strikes and collateral damage, we have bettered our own state
by degrading theirs. Our tragedies make worldwide news and theirs
aren't even mentioned. How many Iraqi and Syrian citizens, not ISIS
or Taliban, but just plain old trying to raise a family in my culture
people, have died by military or terrorist violence (not just at US hands, but total) this century
alone? Thousands? Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
Millions? I would be willing to wager the overwhelming majority of
the western world couldn't even answer the proper order of magnitude,
much less get within a stone's throw of the real number.* Four dead
people in Benghazi get more news time and attention than hundreds of thousands of
dead Muslims in the middle east and Africa. The current narrative is
that we are a racist, selfish country within our own borders and in the larger
world. There is an alarming amount of evidence to back up this
claim. ** I will not definitively state it is true, but there is
more than enough evidence to support that as a viable narrative. If
we go in there arrogant and mad, we feed that narrative more fuel.
That increases the resolve and recruitment of the enemy. Now, we are
sending in our boys and girls to fight a larger, fiercer and more
determined enemy. How does that help?
Here is how I hope it happens.
First, we accept refugees. Again,
because we are compassionate and aren't freaking evil. Also, because
it helps reduce the impression in the world that we are Muslim hating,
racist assholes. We will encourage and support those who do decide
to go in and fight ISIS. The people that live in and around that
region will be forced to fight or be killed. As we know, ISIS isn't
big at the bargaining table. I think of ISIS like Ebola. It is too
virulent and deadly to spread as far as it could. It burns through
the population so fast and so thoroughly that nobody has time to
leave to spread it or survives long enough to take it out of the
region. Still dangerous as hell, but we can contain it. Leave it to
fester in the region and highlight the barbarism, depravity, and
horror they are dealing out to their own people. The whole world
sees it up close and in constant coverage. Hopefully, it burns out
on it's own, like Ebola. Contain it and they kill off so many people
and their barbarism shows through the flames of their own hatred will
be their demise. It is my understanding that they hold executions
near constantly and mass executions with regularity. It wont be long
before there is no one left to support them. Every one of their
fighters that is busy baking bread and fixing the plumbing is one
that isn't firing a rifle or building an IED. And they didn't just take the territory they
hold from no one. There are interested parties that want that land
back. We need to reduce the flow of people to their side. We have to
prove we are the good guys. It would be foolhardy to assume anybody else sees us automatically as the good guys. Especially in the middle east.
If we are attacked, especially by a
refugee or refugees, we still don't go in there unless the attack is
so bad the entire world understands why we go. They kill 200 people,
we don't go. That doesn't justify the type of warfare we will need
to conduct to to any damn good. I don't know what size attack it
would take, but I bet the whole world will know it if we see it.
Think Pearl Harbor.
What I'm afraid will happen is we will
be attacked and go in there trying to fight a war like we did in
Iraq. Hell, even The Onion, knew going into Iraq was stupid. (
http://www.theonion.com/multiblogpost/this-war-will-destabilize-the-entire-mideast-regio-11534)
Let me repeat that. THE ONION had a better grasp of the
consequences of the invasion of Iraq than the Presidential
administration of the time. We cannot afford to make that mistake
again. We get drawn in, still looking like the bad guys to the
Muslim world. Every disenfranchised, unemployed, and oppressed
Muslim in the world sees validation of the ISIS narrative. It is the
Christian West against the Islamic East. I don't think even 1% of
Muslims buy in to that, but even 0.9% of 1.3 billion keeps a war
going for a loooong time. Do you think the people and countries that
would like to see American power diminished in the world would feel
sorry for us and not mess with us while we were so occupied with
this long, drawn out culture war? Yeah, me either. Now we are
pouring money and children into a meat grinder while we diminish our
standing in the world community and allowing the more adversarial
countries a freer reign while we are busy. None of that helps us.
Reduce our treasury, our status and our people. Already we have
problems with debt and helping our veterans I can think of nothing
that would exacerbate those problems more than getting into another
war. We may yet have to anyway. But let it be our last resort.
I heard someone say something that I
think is a perfect fit for this situation. You can't kill an
ideology with a bullet.
But you sure can create one.
* I submit this site only to provide an estimate. I don't assert that this site has totally accurate information but would likely provide an accurate range. This doesn't include Syria or Afghanistan. Imagine the chaos if the USA had 10% of those casualties. This is a humanitarian nightmare of incredible proportions and for the most part we just shrug. Is it any wonder we create more and more enemies in the region?
** Missing white woman syndrome, Beirut
attacks go unnoticed while Paris gets world wide continuous coverage,
Black Lives Matter, US incarceration rates highest in the world with
a disproportionate amount of those imprisoned being minority. I could
go on and on, (Ferguson, Eric Garner)...now I hear you saying those
aren't proof of anything and you are totally right. But, there is a
legitimate perception of this in the world with evidence. Perception
is what matters in this instance.
When we attacked Iraq, I think a large part of the rest of the world wondered why. They understood Afghanistan, but Iraq made little sense except to W and the neocons.
ReplyDeleteI like your write-up above. I agree that we must behave differently and consistently if we have any hope of effectively combatting IS. I am not optimistic that we can do that, given the rhetoric I hear every day.